Chappaqua Has Tough Outlook for 2013-14 Budget

To demonstrate the financial picture school officials present a "rollover" budget scenario, which shows what would happen if the current budget is applied with escalating costs, but without cuts.

Chappaqua school officials noted that the district is facing a challenging financial picture for its upcoming 2013-14 budget.

To convey the severity of the problem, administrators presented an outline of the district's rising costs at Thursday's school board meeting (the presentation can be found here). It included a look at a "rollover" budget, which is not an actual proposal for the following year. Rather, it is a scenario to show what would happen if existing costs are maintained and mixed with new ones.

John Chow, assistant superintendent for business, described the rollover budget as a "placeholder."

“It's really the first look," he said. Chow noted that there will be cost cutting for the actual budget.

Data presented for the rollover show that employee benefits are the highest cost, assuming a hike of 12.2 percent, or $3,040,097. This includes a health insurance cost increase of about three percent, Chow said. The contribution increase figure for one pension fund, the employee retirement system (ERS) is known - it has a 2-percentage-point increase, but the data for the teacher retirement system (TRS) is not at this time, Chow said. However, he noted that it will probably increase by more than 4 percentage points.

Salaries are another big cost driver and the scenario assumes an increase of $1,587,084, or 2.7 percent. Chow noted there is a big unknown for personnel: right now district does not have a new contract set for the next school year with any of its unions. 

Overall, the rollover scenario shows costs rising by 4.6 percent, or $5,168,146. In order to balance the budget at that level, however, the tax levy would need to rise by 5.3 percent, or $5,327,797.

Such a levy would be problematic because it far exceeds that state-mandated tax levy cap, which is the lesser of two percent or the rate of inflation, although districts can go higher due to exemptions such as paying for some pension costs and changes to the local tax base. 

Chow told the school board that the upcoming proposed budget will stay within the cap.

Board members worried about the district's fiscal situation and how it would affect educational quality.

School board president Victoria Tipp noted that the rollover scenario shows the district “just treading water.”

“It's not adding anything new at all to our programs, nothing at all," she said.

Superintendent Lyn McKay noted that the district has been able to keep all of its programs, but even that will be a challenge in the future given financial outlook.

“We're in a good place now despite all the cuts," McKay said about programs, adding that what happens in the next 3-4 years is "highly dependent" on the numbers that come in.

McKay noted the objective the district faces in trying to balance its fiscal situation with keeping its programming quality, something that the school board enshrined in its "strategic questions," which are statements meant to serve as starting points for policy.

The district has made deep job cuts over the past four school years, with 87.66 positions in total getting the ax. The district's overall work force size this year is at 605.20 jobs, according to data presented.

Talk shifted to more radical ways to improve efficiency, and thus help the financial picture improve.

Board Vice President Alyson Kiesel suggested looking into the idea of changing the grade structure of schools to the Princeton Plan model, in which students attend schools zoned by their grades instead of by geography.

Board member Jeffrey Mester suggested raising new revenue through selling courses.

“Why don't we sell our reputation instead of giving it away?”

McKay noted one such example where that could happen, as the district copyrighted its newer local student assessments, which could be used to generate revenue.

Other efficiency items brought up as hypothetical cases including online-based learning and blended grades, where classes could have a mix of kids straddling two grades.

The board will discuss the budget again when McKay presents her recommendation at its Feb. 27 meeting. The school board is then slated to adopt a budget to send to the voters, with the referendum taking place on May 21. Approval is needed in order for the budget to take effect. The district gets up to two votes, and if a budget proposal is defeated twice then it must adopt a contigency budget that would not allow for any hike in the tax levy, Chow said.

Meagan January 25, 2013 at 12:27 PM
Meagan January 25, 2013 at 12:32 PM
It's becoming more apparent that something has to be addressed with the teachers union. We can't keep sustaining their unreasonable costs when we as the taxpayers are cutting costs to keep our heads above water. The state needs to change the pension laws and if a teacher retires and LEAVES our state they get a severely reduced pension payment. They should have to retire within New York State and help pay taxes to support our state.
Patty K January 25, 2013 at 01:48 PM
Our childrens school programs contine to get cut. Curriculum, after school activities like athletics and performing art budgets continue to get cut. Enrichment programs are cut. But teachers salaries and their entitlements continue to escalate. I moved to this community to give my children the best education I could give them and I am willing to pay high taxes to accomplish it. BUT I did not move here to ensure our teachers and adminstrators get paid top dollar while my kids suffer. I am begining to better understand the problem of entitlemnts and why things happened as they did in Wisconcin. It is time out community and school board push back and stand up to teachers union!
Tom Auchterlonie January 25, 2013 at 04:17 PM
With regards to costs, it was noted by board members that state mandates continue to be an issue. Following the presentation, the board talked about a response given from Gov. Cuomo's Mandate Relief Council, which is supposed to hear requests for reviews of mandates. The council denied requests to look at the major items that schools have worried about, including pensions, the Triborough Amendment to the Taylor Law (which keeps terms of expired union contracts in place) and reducing the required mileage for busing kids to private schools from 15 miles to five.
Michele January 25, 2013 at 10:02 PM
Unions definitely need to work with our towns. We can't keep increasing our taxes every single year. It's sick that 2/3 of our taxes go to schools.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »